Excuse me for being a fan of Erich Von Daniken, Zecharia Sitchin, Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, John Anthony West and many other "rogue archeologists," but they do present the facts without any reservations or motivation for self-gain. Since the beginning of the millennium there have been hundreds of archeological finds all over the world that seems to question more about our accepted theory of Earth's history than confirm it. And yet mainstream archeology and our academic system are still clinging on the same old and still unproven history.

There are more submerged cities along coast lines that are being found today than in any other time in recorded history, which clearly indicates that civilization was flourishing far more faster and farther than we believed. And even more astonishing is that the existence of an ante-deluvian culture was not only plausible but they might even be more advanced than we thought they were.

So the question is why haven't we looked into this yet and broke it down in order to understand what happened and how we got here? The suppression of the truth may last for a thousand years but everyone is going to realize it sooner or later.